In his preface to What Maisie Knew James sets out, at some length, both his intention and the technical difficulties involved. Having understood the gist, if not the minutiae, of James’ explanation I suppose it was not surprising that the novel itself should create a similar effect.
Maisie is a little girl cursed with bitterly divorced and rancorous parents. Custody of Maisie is by turns withheld and imposed, as Maisie is shuttled between parents in a manner calculated by each to most incommode the other.
[...] the little girl [was] disposed of in a manner worthy of the judgement-seat of Solomon. She was divided in two and the portions tossed impartially to the disputants.
How Fiction Works pursues parallel paths which pair the methods of construction of fiction with a history of the progression of the form of the novel.
In The Friends of the Friends, as he does in The Turn of the Screw, James creates a ghost out of the psychology of his characters.
First a disclaimer. I love both Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House and Gilman’s The Yellow Wall-Paper, I enjoyed House of Leaves and I cannot fault Henry James’ The Turn of the Screw. So when I say I don’t like ghost stories that is not entirely accurate. But you will notice that the above named have an element in common: a psychological escape clause for the sceptic-reader. (That would be me.)
The Aspern Papers sits in that grey area, uncomfortable for the serial classificist, between novel and novella. We’ll call it a novella. Either way, it is a delightful piece, and is jostling Daisy Miller for top runner on my list of favourite Jamesian works. (Having only read four there isn’t a lot of competition, but What Maisy Knew is a strong contender for expanding the field in the near future.)
Motherless heiress, daughter of Doctor Sloper, a successful New York physician, Catherine Sloper is, seen through her father’s eyes, unattractive and unintelligent. Her Aunt, who also fails to meet Doctor Sloper’s high standards, appears to turn a blind eye to these deficiencies, intent as she is on enjoying a vicarious romance through Catherine’s agencies. It is hardly surprising then that the advent of handsome, if rakish, Morris Townsend, and his ostensible devotion, should turn Catherine’s head, excite Aunt Lavinia’s dearest expectations and provoke Doctor Sloper’s deepest cynicism.
My copy of The Turn of the Screw is a dated beige Penguin Popular Classic, which must go some way to excusing a lack of mindfulness of the content. I recalled ghosts and a faint feeling of dissatisfaction. Oh. And the word ‘silly’ seemed to feature quite strongly in my recollection. Which probably does not reflect my early attitude to Henry James, but rather a somewhat supercillious distaste for all things supernatural.
A recently read review of Daisy Miller left me determined to reacquaint myself with Henry James, despite a schism of many years duration.